Uttarakhand High Court
Prayag Singh vs Tehsil on 17 February, 2026
Author: Pankaj Purohit
Bench: Pankaj Purohit
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
SL. proceedings or
Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
WPMS No.314 of 2021
Prayag Singh ...........Petitioner
Vs.
Tehsil, Sitarganj and others ...........Respondents
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
There is no representation for the petitioner.
2. Mr. B.S. Koranga, B.H. for the State.
3. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for respondent no.3.
4. Since the Advocate for the petitioner has unfortunately expired an administrative notice was sent to the petitioner.
5. On the said notice it has come that petitioner has also expired on 22.11.2024, but the name of the legal representative of the petitioner has not been disclosed.
6. In such view of the matter, Tehsildar-Sitargranj is directed to trace out and supply list of legal representatives of the petitioner-Late Prayag Singh S/o Late Shri Roshan Singh, R/o Village-Bihi, Post Office-Ghidhour, Tehsil- Sitarganj.
7. List this case on 16.04.2026.
8. The said report shall be filed by the Tehsildar-Sitarganj before this Court within a period of 15 days from today.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.02.2026 SK 2