Uttarakhand High Court
Madarsa Faizul Uloom vs State Of Uttarakhand on 17 February, 2026
Author: Pankaj Purohit
Bench: Pankaj Purohit
2026:UHC:1007
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
SL. proceedings or
Date COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
No. directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
WPMS No.357 of 2026
Madarsa Faizul Uloom ...........Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand
and others ...........Respondents
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Shariq Khurshid, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, S.C. for the State.
3. Mr. Davesh Bishnoi, Advocate for respondent no.2.
4. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus to permanently unseal the premises of the petitioner's Madarsa/Maktab situated at Mohalla Alli Khan, Kashipur, District-Udham Singh Nagar on his giving an undertaking to the respondent-Authority that in future petitioner will not operate Madarsa in-question without due recognition by the State under the rules and regulations.
5. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is covered by the judgment and order of the Co-ordinate Bench dated 26.08.2025 in WPMS No.835 of 2025, Madarsa Inamul Ulum Society Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, and batch of writ petitions.
6. Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the contention made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is covered by the 2026:UHC:1007 aforesaid judgment.
7. Accordingly writ petition stands disposed of in light of aforesaid judgment and order.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.02.2026 SK