Venkata Hanumantharao Daggu vs The State Of Telangana

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 118 Tel
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Telangana High Court

Venkata Hanumantharao Daggu vs The State Of Telangana on 26 March, 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
                AT HYDERABAD

     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

            CRIMINAL PETITION No.4412 of 2026

                          Date: 26.03.2026

Between:

Venkata Hanumantharao Daggu and another
                                  ...Petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2
                             AND

The State of Telangana, through S.H.O., P.S. Subedari,
represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana,
High Court Buildings, Hyderabad and another
                                                          ...Respondents

                               ORDER

This Criminal Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.28 of 2026 of P.S. Subedari, Warangal District, wherein the petitioners were arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2 for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 324(5) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNS').

2. Heard Ms. N. Geetha, learned counsel representing Mr. Nageshwar Rao Pujari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jithendar Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1.

2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed the alleged offences and that they have been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegations levelled against the petitioners are purely civil in nature. Even according to the allegations made in the complaint, the ingredients of the offences under Sections 329(4), 324(5) read with 3(5) of BNS are not attracted against the petitioners. She further submitted that the offences levelled against the petitioners are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years. The Investigating Officer, without following the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS'), as well as the guidelines formulated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar 1, is proceeding with the matter, which is contrary to law. Hence, the continuation of the proceedings against the petitioners is a clear abuse of process of law.

4. Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners have already approached this Court and filed Criminal Petition No.1519 of 2026, seeking quashing of the very same proceedings in Crime No.28 of 2026 of P.S. Subedari, Warangal District and the same was disposed of by this Court on 09.02.2026 directing the 1 (2014) 8 SCC 273 3 Investigating Officer to follow the procedure contemplated under Section 35(3) of the BNSS and the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar (supra) and conclude the investigation. Thus, the present Criminal Petition is not maintainable for quashing the very same proceedings against the petitioners.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, basing upon the written instructions dated 25.03.2026 furnished by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Subedari Police Station, Warangal District, submits that the Investigating Officer after concluding the investigation filed final report before the III Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Hanumakonda on 23.03.2026, and the C.C. number is awaited.

6. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, without expressing any view about the maintainability of the present Criminal Petition, the III Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Hanumakonda, is directed to take appropriate steps pursuant to the final report submitted by the Investigating Officer. In the event the learned Magistrate takes cognizance against the petitioners in Crime No.28 of 2026, the petitioners are granted liberty to avail the remedies as available under law by raising all the grounds which are pleaded in the present Criminal Petition.

4

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________ JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO 26.03.2026 ggd