Telangana High Court
L.Ramu, Hyderabad., vs The State Of Telangana, Rep Pp And Anr., on 11 March, 2024
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
I.A.No.1 of 2024
In/and
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1568 of 2017
ORDER:
The present Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C aggrieved by the Judgment dated 31.03.2017 passed in Crl.A.No.340 of 2015 on the file of the learned III Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District (for short 'the appellate Court') confirming the conviction and sentence passed in C.C.No.39 of 2015, dated 01.05.2015 on the file of the learned III Special Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Hasthinapuram (for short 'the trial Court').
2. During pendency of the Criminal Revision Case, I.A.No.1 of 2024 is filed by respondent No.2/de facto complainant to permit the petitioner/accused to file compromise petition and to record the compromise. Along with the petition, a joint memo which is signed by the parties and their counsel, photographs of the parties and Photostat copies of their Aadhar Cards are filed. It is 2 stated in the affidavit that at the intervention of elders and well wishers, the parties have compromised the matter. In pursuance of the said compromise dated 14.10.2017 (memorandum of understanding), the petitioner/accused paid respondent No.2/de facto complainant an amount of Rs.62,500/- and allowed respondent No.2 to withdraw the challan amount of Rs.50,000/- paid by the petitioner/accused on 15.06.2015. Respondent No.2 have already withdrawn the said amount of Rs.50,000/-. Hence, the total settlement amount was Rs.1,12,000/-.
3. In pursuance of the directions of this Court dated 06.03.2024, the petitioner/accused has deposited 10 % of the settlement amount of Rs.1,12,000/- which comes to Rs.11,200/-. Hence, the petitioner/accused deposited Rs.5,600/- before the Legal Services Authority vide receipt No.648 dated 06.03.2024 and Rs.5,600/- before the High Court Bar Association vide order No.INVO32445839, dated 06.03.2024.
4. Today, both the parties are present before this Court and they were identified by their respective counsel. This 3 Court, when examined, both the parties have stated that at the instance of the elders, they have settled the matter out of the Court and respondent No.2 has no objection for quashing the proceedings against the petitioner/accused.
5. In the light of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the compromise memo filed by both the parties is recorded and I.A.No.1 of 2024 is ordered.
6. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed in terms of compromise, and the proceedings in C.C.No.39 of 2015 on the file of the learned III Special Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Hasthinapuram, against the petitioner who has been arrayed as accused is hereby quashed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL Date: 11.03.2024 vsu