Telangana High Court
Vemula Raj Kumar vs Smt.Bobba Gayatri on 21 June, 2024
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1436 of 2024
ORDER:
Sri B.Anil, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the Court below reserved the O.S.No.163 of 2022 on 10.11.2023 for judgment but no judgment was delivered for quite some time. Thus, the petitioner filed CRP No.920 of 2024, which was disposed of on 28.03.2024 by this Court directing the Court below to pronounce the judgment at the earliest, preferably, within a period of 30 days from 28.03.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this order of the Court was brought to the notice of the Court below on 10.04.2024, the date when matter was listed before the Court below. The Court below did not pronounce the judgment. It was pointed out that the concerned Judicial Officer in whose Court the said O.S. was reserved for judgment from 10.11.2023 stood transferred by order dated 23.04.2024. By placing reliance on a Circular of this Court dated 10.11.2023, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that non pronouncement of judgment runs contrary to the said circular.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length. 2
3. Since the concerned Judge was transferred before completion of period of 30 days from the decision of said CRP, I find no reason to interfere in this matter. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. However, in the interest of justice, it is observed that the new Presiding Officer who has taken the charge of the previous Judicial Officer who had heard and reserved the O.S.No.163 of 2022 shall hear the matter afresh and decide it expeditiously, by taking into account the aforesaid Circular of the High Court. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL Date: 21.06.2024 ns/myk 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1436 of 2024 Date: 21.06.2024 ns/myk