Telangana High Court
Gollapalli Upendra, Warangal District vs The State Of A.P.,Rep. By P.P.,High ... on 3 July, 2024
1
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1620 OF 2009
JUDGMENT:
The revision petitioner is the de-facto complainant. He has filed the present Revision seeking enhancement of sentence of imprisonment imposed by the Assistant Sessions Judge.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner/de-facto complainant and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent-State.
3. The accused was convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of one year for the offence under Section 363 of IPC and three years of imprisonment for the offence under Section 376 r/w. 511 of IPC.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would submit that the victim was aged 7 years and the sentence passed by the Court below is less and accordingly sought enhancement of sentence.
5. For enhancement of sentence, the appeal has to be filed before the concerned appellate Court. In the present 2 case, the petitioner/de-facto complainant ought to have approached the Sessions Court by filing an appeal seeking enhancement.
6. For the above said reason, the Criminal Revision is dismissed. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________ K.SURENDER, J Date: 03.07.2024 dv