Dakoji Venkatamma vs State Of Telangana

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2215 Tel
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2023

Telangana High Court
Dakoji Venkatamma vs State Of Telangana on 11 September, 2023
Bench: Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

      WRIT PETITION Nos.5569 AND 5587 OF 2019

COMMON ORDER:

      The petitioners in both the Writ Petitions are the

successors-in-interest of one late Mr. Mangali Narasaiah,

who     was     assigned      land     to     an    extent    of

Acs.18.00 gts., situated in Sy.No.228 through proceedings

RC    No.5439/55/B-3,      dated     03.06.1955,   situated   in

Choutuppal    Village   and   Mandal,       Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri

District.

2.    A portion of the said extent of land admeasuring

Acs.4.20 gts., was stated to be treated as a 'Government

land' and was included in the list of 'prohibited properties'.

Some of the successors of the said late Mr. Mangali

Narasaiah approached this Court by filing Writ Petition

No.40402 of 2017 and the said Writ Petition was allowed

by a learned single Judge of this Court by an order, dated

13.07.2018, holding that the said assignment was made

prior to issuance of G.O.Ms.No.1406, dated 25.07.1958

and there was no condition of non-alienation in the said
                                  ::2::
                                                              MSK,J
                                                 WP_5569 & 5587_2019




assignment and therefore, the provisions of the Telangana

Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 (for

short 'the Act, 1977'), have no application to the said

extent of land. Aggrieved by the said order passed in Writ

Petition No.40402 of 2017, the State filed Writ Appeal

No.91 of 2020 and the same was dismissed by a learned

Division     Bench   of   this   Court   by   Judgment,     dated

10.08.2021. The said judgment is stated to have become

final.

3.       The petitioners in these two Writ Petitions are the

persons claiming a similar extent of Acs.4.20 gts., out of

the total extent of Acs.18.00 gts., which was assigned in

favour of late Mr. Mangali Narasaiah in the year 1955. It is

the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners

that the petitioners herein stand on the same footing as

that of the petitioners in Writ Petition No.40402 of 2017

and therefore, the petitioners herein are entitled for

extending the benefit of the very same order, as confirmed

in Writ Appeal No.91 of 2020. The factual aspects are not

disputed by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for

Revenue.
                               ::3::
                                                           MSK,J
                                              WP_5569 & 5587_2019




4.   Taking into consideration the fact that the nature of

total extent of Acs.18.00 gts., was already considered by a

learned single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition

No.40402 of 2017 and the petitioners herein, being the

successors of late Mr. Mangali Narasaiah, claiming a

portion out of the said extent of land Acs.18.00 gts., and

the undisputed fact situation, this Court is of the

considered view that the issue involved in these Writ

Petitions is squarely covered by the order passed by this

Court in Writ Petition No.40402 of 2017, dated 13.07.2018,

as confirmed in Writ Appeal No.91 of 2020, dated

10.08.2021 and the petitioners herein are also entitled for

extension of the benefit of the said order.

5.   In the light of the above, these two Writ Petitions are

allowed and the respondents are directed to delete the

subject land admeasuring Acs.4.20 gts., in Sy.No.228 of Choutuppal Village and Mandal, Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District, each which is the subject matter of these two Writ Petitions, from the list of 'prohibited properties' under Section 22A of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short 'the Act, 1908'), and respondent No.5 further directed to ::4::

MSK,J WP_5569 & 5587_2019 receive, register and release the documents presented by the petitioners in respect of the subject land or portion thereof, without raising any objection that the said land was included in the list of 'prohibited properties' under Section 22A of the Act, 1908, subject to compliance of other formalities under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and the Registration Act, 1908.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any in these Writ Petitions, shall stand closed. No costs.

___________________________________ MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J Date: 11.09.2023 NDS ::5::

MSK,J WP_5569 & 5587_2019 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.5569 AND 5587 OF 2019 Date: 11.09.2023 NDS