THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
A.S.No.718 of 2008
JUDGMENT:
1. The present appeal has been filed aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 23.04.2007 passed in O.S.No.5 of 2003 on the file of Principal District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy.
2. There is no representation for the appellant.
3. Inspite of service of notice, there is no representation for respondents.
4. On the last date of hearing, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the appellant, and therefore, the matter was directed to be posted to today under the caption 'for dismissal'. In spite of matter being listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation for the appellant. This shows that the appellant has not evinced any interest in prosecuting the case. Therefore, this appeal is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution.
5. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ P.SREE SUDHA, J Date:01.09.2023.
krl 2 484 THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA A.S.No.718 of 2008 Dt.01.09.2023 krl