1
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.215 OF 2022
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed to set aside the order dated 18.01.2022 passed in Crl.M.P.No.56 of 2020 in S.C.No.311 of 2018 by the I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad. The petitioners herein are accused Nos.1 to 3 in the said case. The offences alleged against the petitioners herein are 498-A, 420, 406, 204, 195(A) and 313 of IPC.
2. Heard Sri K.Venumadhav, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri Khaja Vizarath Ali, learned Asst. Public Prosecutor for the respondent - State. Perused the record.
3. The petitioners herein have filed a petition vide Crl.M.P.No.56 of 2020 under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. seeking their discharge. Vide impugned order dated 18.01.2022, learned I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, at Hyderabad, has dismissed the said application.
4. Sri K.Venumadhav, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that the Court below has not considered several contentions raised by the petitioners herein in the discharge application and the impugned order is not a reasoned order. However, on perusal of the record would reveal that the Court below has considered all the contentions raised by the petitioners herein including the judgments cited by the petitioners herein. According to this Court, the 2 impugned order is a reasoned order. The defences taken by the petitioners cannot be considered in a petition filed under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. The Court below has considered the entire material on record and dismissed the application filed by the petitioners herein. It is a reasoned order. It does not warrant any interference with the impugned order by this Court in this revision.
5. Considering the fact that there are matrimonial dispute between the 1st petitioner and the defacto-complainant, the petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the parents of the 1st petitioner/A.1 and in matrimonial disputes identification of the parties is not in dispute, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. The presence of the petitioner Nos.2 and 3 in S.C.No.311 of 2018 pending on the file of I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad, is dispensed with. However, they shall appear before the said Court as and when their presence is required.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ K. LAKSHMAN, J Date: 18.04.2022 vvr