THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT APPEAL No.542 of 2022
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan)
Heard Mr. J.Raghuram, learned counsel for the
appellant; Mr. T.Srikanth Reddy, learned Government
Pleader for Home appearing for respondents No.1 and 5;
Mr. Parsa Ananth Nageswara Rao, learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents No.2 to 4; and Mr. K.V.Sudhakar, learned counsel for respondents No.6 and 7.
2. This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 08.08.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of W.P.No.12425 of 2021 filed by the appellant himself as the writ petitioner.
3. Order dated 08.08.2022 reads as under:
"This writ petition is filed questioning the action of respondent No.5 in not providing police protection to the petitioner and his family members upon the petitioner's representation sent through Whatsapp 2 message to the mobile of respondent No.5 bearing No.8332902954 from the petitioner's mobile No.9390585179 on 24-04-2021 at about 7.11 AM according to the orders of this Court dated 21-05-2020 in W.P.No.3899 of 2020, as illegal and arbitrary, and to direct respondent No.5 to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family members to conduct the agricultural operations in Sy.No.628 to an extent of Ac.7-05 gts, situated at Phanigiri Village, Nagaram Mandal, Suryapet District, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. In the light of the orders passed by this Court today in W.P.No.12428 of 2021, wherein this Court has given liberty to the petitioner to make an appropriate application to the Superintendant of Police to provide police protection in the light of G.O.Rt.No.655 dated 30-03-1997, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition."
4. From a perusal of the above, it is seen that appellant had filed another writ petition, being W.P.No.12428 of 2021, wherein this Court granted liberty to the appellant to make appropriate application before the Superintendent of Police to provide police protection. Therefore, learned Single Judge held that no further orders were called for. 3
5. We fail to understand as to how appellant can claim to be a person aggrieved by the aforesaid order passed by the learned Single Judge. As it is, we have grave doubts about seeking police protection for asserting land rights of rival parties. This we have indicated in our order dated 30.08.2022 passed in W.A.No.562 of 2022, incidentally filed by the son of the present appellant.
6. We do not find any good reason to entertain the writ appeal.
7. Writ appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
______________________________________ UJJAL BHUYAN, CJ ______________________________________ C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J 19.09.2022 vs