The Commissioner Of Income Taxiii vs M/S.Incon Engineering P Ltd

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4622 Tel
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2022

Telangana High Court
The Commissioner Of Income Taxiii vs M/S.Incon Engineering P Ltd on 14 September, 2022
Bench: Ujjal Bhuyan, C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
       THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
                                          AND
           THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
                        I.T.T.A. No.251 of 2003
JUDGMENT:      (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan)



     Heard       Mr.       B.Narsimha              Sarma,          learned      counsel

representing      Ms.       K.Mamata             Chowdary,          learned      Senior

Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department appearing for

the appellant and Mr. Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel

for the respondent.

2. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been filed against the order dated 11.03.2003 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad (Tribunal) in I.T.A.No.1286/Hyd/1995 for the assessment year 1991-92.

3. In the appeal, the following substantial questions of law have been proposed:

"A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is justified in holding that Accounting Standard-7 prescribed by Institute of Chartered Accountants would be appropriate and applicable even in relation to execution of turnkey projects of engineering contracts of a shorter duration ?
2
B) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is justified in recording the finding that the method of accounting system maintained by the assessee is not correct, notwithstanding the assessee adopting inapplicable AS-7 to an engineering contract of a shorter duration ?
C) Whether the findings of the Appellate Tribunal in this behalf are based on material on record ? D) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is justified in holding that rejection of books of accounts is impermissible merely because the assessee had maintained accounts in accordance with AS-7 consistently?

4. On 15.12.2003, the appeal was admitted.

5. In the hearing today, we have perused the assessment order dated 23.03.1994. We find therefrom that the taxable income of the respondent was determined at Rs.4,17,419.00 and quantum of tax to be paid was assessed at Rs.2,72,249.00.

6. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued Circular No.17 of 2019, dated 08.08.2019, amending the previous Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, by further enhancing the monetary limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and Supreme Court as a measure for 3 reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the said circular we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appeal before the High Court is Rs.1.00 crore.

7. In the instant appeal, tax effect is of Rs.2,72,249/-, which is well below the monetary limit.

8. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed in terms of the aforesaid Circular No.17 of 2019, dated 08.08.2019. However, if the appeal comes within the exception under paragraph 10 of Circular No.3 of 2018, it would be open to the Income Tax Department to seek revival of the appeal.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

______________________________________ UJJAL BHUYAN, CJ ______________________________________ C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J 14.09.2022 Lur