Telangana High Court
Manikanta Enterprises And 2 ... vs The State Of Telangana And 7 Others on 10 October, 2022
Bench: Ujjal Bhuyan, C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT APPEAL No.641 of 2022
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan)
Heard Mr. Ch.Venkat Raman, learned counsel for the
appellants and Mr. A.Santosh Kumar, learned Government
Pleader attached to the Office of the learned Advocate
General.
2. On 28.09.2022 we had passed the following order:
"While learned counsel for the appellants
submits that the present appeal is identical to
W.A.No.554 of 2022, which was disposed of on
29.08.2022 and therefore, seeks disposal of
the present writ appeal in similar terms,
learned Government Pleader submits that in
the case of the appellants, there is no article
like article 11(b) in respect of the contract
agreement. Rather, the present appeal is
identical to W.A.No.595 of 2022, which was
dismissed vide order dated 15.09.2022.
Learned counsel for the appellants may
examine this aspect.
List this matter after Dasara Vacation,
2022 i.e., on 10.10.2022."
2 HCJ & CVBRJ
W.A.No.641 of 2022
3. In the hearing today, learned counsel for the
appellants fairly submits that the present appeal is identical
to Writ Appeal No.595 of 2022 which was dismissed vide
order dated 15.09.2022.
4. In view of above and following the order dated
15.09.2022
passed in Writ Appeal No.595 of 2022, the present Writ Appeal is also dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Appeal, shall stand closed.
__________________________ UJJAL BHUYAN, CJ ___________________________ C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J Date: 10.10.2022 KL/MRM