THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1530 OF 2008
JUDGMENT:
The petitioner is the defacto complainant filed this revision questioning the correctness of acquittal recorded by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, in C.C.No.178 of 2005, acquitting the 1st respondent/accused for the offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
As seen from the record it is the case of the petitioner/complainant that he approached 1st respondent/accused, introduced by one Nizam, for his help to improve his Auto Mobile shop as he was having supernatural powers. The 1st respondent/accused assured such evil would be removed from his shop and took an amount of Rs.19,000/-. Then the accused performed some 'pooja' and asked the petitioner to wait for 40 days for results. waited for 40 days and since there was no improvement in the business, a complaint was filed by the petitioner.
The learned Magistrate found that there was no inducement by the 1st respondent or claimed to have miracles or divine powers and consequently extracted money. 2
In the said circumstances, the learned Magistrate found that there was no offence which is made out under Section 420 of the Indian Penal code and accordingly quashed.
On perusal of the proceeding sheet it appears that the learned Counsel for the petitioner did not appear on 17.06.2022, 24.06.2022, 14.10.2022, 07.11.2022 and 16.11.2022.
Since no case is made out on facts, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending, shall also stand closed.
__________________ K.SURENDER, J Date: 26.12.2022 tk 3 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1530 OF 2008 Dt. 26.12.2022 tk