HON'BLE SRI JUSTICHE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.44959 of 2022
ORDER:
Heard Sri Srinivas Velagapudi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1, 5 and 6, learned Government Pleader for Irrigation for respondent No.2 and learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration for respondent No.3 and Sri M.A.K. Mukeed, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.4. Perused the record.
Petitioner is claiming that she is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.1-26 gts., in Sy.No.55 situated at Khanamet village, Serilingampally mandal, Ranga Reddy district, on the strength of a registered sale deed bearing document No.6398 of 1996 dated 24-07-1996. Government filed LGC No.101 of 1997 contending that petitioner and one Jagruthi Foundation have grabbed the aforesaid property and the said application was ordered vide judgment and decree dated 2 24-03-2004. Challenging the said judgment and decree, petitioner and the said Jagruthi Foundation have filed writ petitions vide W.P.Nos.9459 and 9481 of 2004.
This Court, vide common order dated 13-09-2007, allowed the said writ petitions and set aside the aforesaid judgment and decree in LGC.No.101 of 1997 dated 24-03-2004 passed by the Special Court under Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act.
According to Sri Srinivas Velagapudi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner respondent has filed SLP challenging the said order and the same was also dismissed. Even then, respondent No.4 is trying to dispossess the petitioner from the aforesaid property.
Whereas Sri M.A.K. Mukeed, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.4 had produced written instructions from ACP-21, wherein it is specifically mentioned that respondent No.4 never interfere with the petitioners property and if petitioners commences any unauthorized construction, they will take action, in 3 accordance with law. The said written instructions are placed on record.
In view of the same, this writ petition is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to take steps, in accordance with law, if necessary. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
__________________ K. LAKSHMAN, J December 15, 2022 PN 4 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.44959 of 2022 December 15, 2022 PN