Telangana High Court
The Commissioner Of Income ... vs M/S Venkateswara Hatcheries ... on 14 December, 2022
Bench: Ujjal Bhuyan, C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
I.T.T.A. No.239 of 2006
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan)
Heard Ms. Sapna Reddy, learned counsel representing on
behalf of Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Standing Counsel, Income Tax
Department for the appellant.
2. This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue as the
appellant under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (briefly
referred to hereinafter as the 'Act'), assailing the legality and
validity of the order dated 26.10.2005 passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad (Tribunal) in
ITA No.341/Hyd/2002 for the assessment year 1998-99.
3. Ms. Sapna Reddy, learned counsel fairly submits that tax
effect in this appeal is below the monetary limit for filing appeal.
4. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued
Circular No.17 of 2019, dated 08.08.2019, amending the previous
Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, by further enhancing the
monetary limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department
2 HCJ & CVBRJ
I.T.T.A.No.239 of 2006
before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and
Supreme Court as a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph
2 of the said circular we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing
an appeal before the High Court is Rs.1.00 crore.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is
dismissed in terms of the aforesaid Circular No.17 of 2019, dated
08.08.2019
. However, if the appeal comes within the exception under paragraph 10 of Circular No.3 of 2018, it would be open to the Income Tax Department to seek revival of the appeal. No costs.
6. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed.
__________________________ UJJAL BHUYAN, CJ ___________________________ C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J Date: 14.12.2022 KL