Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams vs Sri N. Saibaba

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3005 Tel
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2021

Telangana High Court
Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams vs Sri N. Saibaba on 26 October, 2021
Bench: Satish Chandra Sharma, A.Rajasheker Reddy
  THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
                                       AND
       THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY


                   WRIT APPEAL No.549 of 2021

JUDGMENT:    (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)




     The present writ appeal is arising out of order dated

28.07.2021    passed         by      the      learned         Single     Judge   in

W.P.No.17318 of 2021.

     The facts of the case reveal that the writ petitioner has

preferred a writ petition stating that he has booked Arjitha

Seva ticket on 22.07.2006 for Poorabhishekam Seva and a

slot was allotted for seva on 12.02.2021. He further stated

that on account of COVID-19 pandemic, the Tirumala

Tirupathi Devasthanams has cancelled Arjitha Seva from

19.03.2020 to 13.04.2021 permitting the ticket holders to

take refund or to opt for VIP break darshan. A prayer was

made in the writ petition for deciding the representation

preferred by the writ petitioner and the learned Single Judge

has allowed the writ petition directing the present appellant

Nos.2 and 3 to allot Arjitha Seva to the writ petitioner.

     Learned counsel for the appellants has argued before

this Court that no notice of any kind was issued in the

matter. No counsel was engaged by the appellants - Tirumala

Tirupathi Devasthanams at any point of time. The learned

Single Judge while hearing the matter in motion hearing has

passed the impugned order and, therefore, the order suffers
                                 2




from violation of principles of natural justice and fairly stated

that as no reply has been filed in the matter, the same

deserves to be set aside.

     At      this   stage,    learned     counsel      for   writ

petitioner/respondent No.1 has stated before this Court that

he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and liberty be granted to him to file a writ petition before the Andhra Pradesh High Court.

The prayer is allowed.

The writ petitioner/respondent No.1 in the present writ appeal is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.17318 of 2021 on 28.07.2021 is hereby set aside and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

With the aforesaid, the writ appeal is allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Appeal shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

__________________________________ SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ ______________________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 26.10.2021 ES