Mechael vs The State Of Telangana

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2974 Tel
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2021

Telangana High Court
Mechael vs The State Of Telangana on 25 October, 2021
Bench: Satish Chandra Sharma, A.Rajasheker Reddy
  THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
                                   AND
        THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY



                  Writ Appeal No.486 of 2021


JUDGMENT:   (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)




      The appellant before this Court has filed this writ

appeal being aggrieved by the order dated 17.08.2021

passed in I.A.No.1 of 2021 and I.A.No.1 of 2020 in

W.P.No.1074 of 2018.


      Learned counsel for the appellant has argued before

this Court that the writ petition i.e., W.P.No.1074 of 2018

was preferred alleging unauthorised construction by the

respondent No.6 over the land which is the subject

matter of the writ petition and the learned Single Judge has granted an interim order of status quo on 02.11.2020. It has been further stated that an application for vacating the interim order was preferred in the matter by the respondent No.6. He has further stated that during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent No.6 started the construction activity and the learned Single Judge has vacated the interim order, which was passed against the respondent No.6 only because the respondent No.6 was constructing on the land in question.

2

Learned counsel for the respondent No.6, in open Court, stated before this Court that they have stopped all the construction activities and they shall not be carrying out any construction activity till the matter is decided finally by the learned Single Judge.

In the light of the aforesaid undertaking, the interim order, which was granted earlier, is continued and the learned Single Judge is requested to decide the matter finally at an early date, preferably, within a period of three months from today.

With the aforesaid, the writ appeal stands disposed of. The miscellaneous applications pending in this appeal, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

___________________________ SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ ___________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 25.10.2021 vs