Syed Naseeruddin vs State Of Telangana

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2964 Tel
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2021

Telangana High Court
Syed Naseeruddin vs State Of Telangana on 25 October, 2021
Bench: Satish Chandra Sharma, A.Rajasheker Reddy
  THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
                                    AND
         THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY



                  WRIT APPEAL No.519 of 2021

JUDGMENT:    (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)




      The present writ appeal is arising out of an order dated

15.09.2021    passed        by    the     learned        Single      Judge   in

W.P.No.22292 of 2021 filed by the present appellants.

      The facts of the case reveal that the writ petition was

preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for

issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction stating that

respondent Nos.2 to 4 are trying to interfere with the peaceful

possession of the writ petitioners/appellants. It was also brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge that the petitioners have also filed a civil suit i.e., O.S.No.66 of 2015 and the same is pending.

Learned Single Judge was informed by the learned Government Advocate that merely because a criminal case has been registered against the petitioners, they have impleaded the Station House Officer also as a respondent in the writ petition.

Undisputedly, a case was registered as Crime No.200 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 341, 448 and 506 of the IPC against the writ petitioners/appellants. The learned Single Judge has disposed of the writ petition. 2

In the considered opinion of this Court, the order passed by the learned Single Judge does not warrant any interference. In case the writ petitioners/appellants are having any threat of dispossession, they are certainly free to file an application for grant of injunction in the civil suit, which is pending since 2015 in respect of the same property. In case the appellants are making allegations against the Station House Officer, they can certainly prefer a complaint, if so advised. This Court does not find any reason to interfere in the order passed by the learned Single Judge.

The appeal is dismissed accordingly. The miscellaneous petitions pending in this appeal, if any, shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_____________________________ SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ _________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 25.10.2021 ES