T.V.Bhaskara Rao vs Union Of India And 4 Others

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2899 Tel
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2021

Telangana High Court
T.V.Bhaskara Rao vs Union Of India And 4 Others on 18 October, 2021
Bench: Satish Chandra Sharma, A.Rajasheker Reddy
           The Hon'ble The Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
                                                and
                  The Hon'ble Sri Justice A. Rajasheker Reddy
                             Writ Petition No.25517 of 2021
Order: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)

        The petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition

being aggrieved by order dated 22.09.2011, passed by the Central

Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in O.A.No.633 of 2001.

2.      The facts of the case reveal that an FIR was lodged against the

petitioner on 07.04.2017 for allegedly committing the offences

punishable         under        Sections        120-B,        409,   420,   477-A   IPC

r/w Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,

1988, by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the case is

pending before the Court of the Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases,

Hyderabad.

3.      The petitioner's contention is that on same facts and

circumstances, a departmental enquiry has also been initiated against

him. The petitioner has earlier approached the Central Administrative

Tribunal as well as this Court and this Court by order dated 13.08.2020,

in W.P.No.12195 of 2020, stayed the departmental enquiry proceedings

for a period of one year. After expiry of a period of one year, as the

Department has started the proceedings, the petitioner has filed an

Original Application (OA) once again before the Tribunal along with

an application for grant of interim relief. The Tribunal has admitted

the matter by order dated 22.09.2021.
 4.         Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued before this Court

that the OA before the Tribunal will become infructuous, if the matter

is not decided at an early date.

5.         On the other hand, learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing

for respondent No.1/Union of India has stated before this Court that

the proceedings were kept in abeyance for a period of one year as directed by this Court and therefore, in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court reported in SBI and others vs. Neelam Nag and others1, the departmental enquiry has to be finalised.

6. In the considered opinion of this Court, as the matter is already pending before the Tribunal, all the facts and grounds can be looked into by the Tribunal itself and the matter can be decided on merits. Accordingly, the Tribunal is requested to decide the matter, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 30 days from today, as a very short point is involved. The parties shall appear before the Tribunal on 20.10.2021. It is needless to mention that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.

7. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Consequently, Interlocutory Applications, pending if any, stand disposed of.

_______________________ Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ ____________________ A. Rajasheker Reddy, J 18.10.2021 lur 1 2016 9 SCC 491