Telangana High Court
D. Muralidhara Rao vs The Honorable Industrial ... on 24 November, 2021
Bench: Satish Chandra Sharma, A.Rajasheker Reddy
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT APPEAL No.566 of 2019
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)
The present writ appeal is arising out of the order
dated 24.08.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in
W.P.No.19165 of 2006.
The facts of the case reveal that the appellant/writ
petitioner made a statement before the learned Single
Judge that he is entitled for the benefits flowing out of
service rendered from 1984 to 2002 and the same be paid
to him. A concession was made by the learned counsel
for the Corporation that the appellant/writ petitioner will
be entitled for the benefits as per the Regulations and in
those circumstances, with the consent of the parties, the
order was passed to release the service benefits to the
appellant/writ petitioner for the services rendered from
the year 1984 to 2002 in accordance with the
Regulations.
In the light of the aforesaid fact that it was a
consent order, this Court does not find reason to
interfere in the writ appeal.
The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed with a
liberty to the appellant/writ petitioner to file a review
2
petition in case he is still aggrieved in the matter. The
miscellaneous applications pending in this writ appeal, if
any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to
costs.
___________________________
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ
___________________________
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
24.11.2021
vs