Telangana State Road Transport ... vs Power Engineering Works

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3661 Tel
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2021

Telangana High Court
Telangana State Road Transport ... vs Power Engineering Works on 22 November, 2021
Bench: Satish Chandra Sharma, A.Rajasheker Reddy
    THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
                                        AND
           THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY



                     WRIT APPEAL No.433 of 2019


JUDGMENT:   (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)


     Learned counsel for the appellants has drawn the

attention of this Court towards the common judgment dated

09.03.2021 passed in W.A.No.710 of 2019 and other

connected matters.           The following common judgment has

been passed by the Division Bench:-

     "1.    The appellants are aggrieved by the orders passed by
     the learned Single Judge in different writ petitions filed by
     the respondents seeking to direct the appellants to collect

monthly licence fee from them without insisting on payment of GST along with the licence fee, during the pendency of the writ petitions.

2. By separate orders passed in the writ petitions, the learned Single Judge granted the interim relief as prayed for by the respondents/writ petitioners. In other words, the appellants have been restrained from collecting the GST along with the licence fee from the respondents/writ petitioners. Aggrieved by the said interim orders, the present intra-court appeals have been filed. By separate orders passed in each of the appeals, operation of the interim orders passed in the writ petitions has been stayed. The said order is continuing to operate till date.

3. We have enquired from learned counsel for the parties as to the status of the writ petitions filed by the respondents. Learned counsel state that the pleadings in most of the writ petitions are complete and they are ripe for final arguments. However, no actual date has been fixed.

4. Learned counsel for the parties agree that instead of pressing the present appeals or the vacate stay applications moved by the appellants and still pending in the writ petitions, it would be appropriate if the writ petitions are 2 taken up for final hearing and disposal. They state that as the fact situation in all the matters is almost similar they shall jointly request the learned Single Judge to treat W.P.No.14585 of 2019 (subject matter of W.A.No.710 of 2019), as the lead matter for purposes of arguments.

5. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, the present appeals are disposed of along with the pending applications, if any, while confirming the interim orders passed in the appeals, the parties shall appear before the learned Single Judge in the pending writ petitions on 25.03.2021, for an actual date to be fixed for arguments."

In the light of the aforesaid judgment, the present writ appeal also stands disposed of. The judgment passed by the Division Bench dated 09.03.2021 shall be applicable mutatis mutandis to the present case also.

Office is directed to list W.P.No.14585 of 2019 and other connected matters before the Bench having roster on 27.12.2021. The impugned order in the present case shall remain in abeyance.

The miscellaneous applications pending in this appeal, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

___________________________ SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ ___________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 22.11.2021 vs