Telangana High Court
Dr N. Sharmila vs Dr N.R.K. Raju on 23 March, 2021
Bench: Hima Kohli, B.Vijaysen Reddy
Items No.5-6
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
F.C.A.Nos.133 and 139 of 2007
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hima Kohli)
1. Pursuant to the order dated 02.03.2021, learned counsel enter
appearance on behalf of the appellant/wife.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant/wife state that they have been
informed that the respondent/husband had expired in the year 2015.
3. In view of the said development, nothing survives for adjudication in the present appeals. Both the appeals are disposed of as infructuous along with the pending applications, if any, in view of the demise of the respondent/husband. The interim order granted in F.C.A.No.139 of 2007 stands vacated.
______________________________ HIMA KOHLI, CJ ______________________________ B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J 23.03.2021 JSU