Muthyam Suryanarayana Suresh vs The State Of Telangana

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 822 Tel
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2021

Telangana High Court
Muthyam Suryanarayana Suresh vs The State Of Telangana on 17 March, 2021
Bench: K.Lakshman
             THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

                 CRIMINAL PETITION No.1945 of 2021

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1014 of 2017, pending on the file of IX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The offences alleged against the petitioners/Accused Nos.5 and 6 are under Sections 272, 273 and 336 read with 34 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the subject matter is squarely covered by a common order in Chidurala Shyamsubder v. State of Telangana1 rendered by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, and placed copy of the said judgment for perusal.

3. In Chidurala Shyamsubder's case (supra), a learned Single Judge of the High Court, following the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal2, held that the Police are incompetent to take cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 45 and 59(1) of the Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act, 2006, investigating into the offences along with other 1 Crl.P.No.3731 of 2018 & batch, decided on 27.08.2018 2 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 2 offences under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and filing charge sheet is grave illegality, as the Food Officer alone is competent to investigate and to file charge sheet following the Rules laid down under Sections 41 and 42 of FSS Act, whereas, in the present case, the Police have registered the crime for the offences under Sections 272, 273 and 336 read with 34 IPC. Therefore, the said proceedings in C.C.No.1014 of 2017 against the petitioners herein are contrary to the principle held by the learned Single Judge of the High Court in Chidurala Shyamsubder (supra) and, accordingly, the same are liable to be quashed.

4. In view of the above submission, the present Criminal Petition is allowed in terms of the judgment in Chidurala Shyamsubder (supra), and the proceedings in C.C.No.1014 of 2017, pending on the file of IX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioners/accused No.5 and 6.

5. Since the proceedings in C.C.No.1014 of 2017 are quashed against the petitioners/accused Nos.5 and 6, the petitioners are at liberty to file appropriate application before the Court below for return of seized property/vehicle. On such application is being filed, the Court below is directed to release the seized property/vehicle to the petitioners on verifying the documents with regard to 3 ownership of the said property. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this petition, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN Date: 17.03.2021 dv