Item No.2
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
C.A.No.11 of 2016
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hima Kohli)
1. This order is in continuation of the orders passed on 16.03.2021
and 16.06.2021. On the last date of hearing, as none was present on
behalf of the respondent, learned counsel for the appellant was
directed to give a written intimation of the next date of hearing directly to the respondent to ensure its presence. Today, Mr. Venugopal, Proprietor of the respondent appears and states that he has no objection if the court allows the present appeal limited to setting aside the order of conviction passed against the appellant, since the goods in question were released in favour of the respondent on 28.12.2015, though belatedly.
2. We had noted the statement made on behalf of the appellant on the last date of hearing that she has not faced any other contempt proceedings or been indicted in any contempt proceedings in the past. She has also deposited the fine of Rs.1,116/- with the Telangana State Legal Services Authority, as imposed on her.
3. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the respondent and the assurance given by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant C.A.No.11 of 2016 Page 1 of 2 shall be more careful in the future, when it comes to timely compliance of the orders passed by the court, the present appeal is allowed and disposed of along with the pending applications, if any. The operative paragraph of the impugned order dated 25.04.2016, passed in C.C.No.1922 of 2015, insofar as the appellant has been convicted, is quashed and set aside.
______________________________ HIMA KOHLI, CJ ______________________________ B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J 28.06.2021 JSU/PLN C.A.No.11 of 2016 Page 2 of 2