Item No.23
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
W.A.No.787 OF 2019
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hima Kohli)
1. The appellant (respondent No.7 in W.P.No.21466 of 2019) is
aggrieved by an interim order dated 30.09.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge on an interim application, registered as I.A.No.1 of 2019, moved by the respondent No.1/writ petitioner praying inter alia for issuing directions to the respondent/authorities (District Registrar/ Sub-Registrar) not to receive or register or release any document presented by the respondent No.6/M/s. Prime Properties in respect of its land situated in Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the said petition. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has taken note of an order dated 04.06.2019 passed in W.P.No.22896 of 2018 and granted the interim relief as prayed for by the petitioner.
2. Mr. Satish Parasaran, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant/respondent No.7 submits that vide order dated 29.06.2020 passed by the Division Bench in W.A.No.500 of 2019 and connected appeals, the interim order dated 04.06.2019 granted in favour of the petitioner in W.P.No.22896 of 2018, was vacated.
3. We are informed that aggrieved by the aforesaid order dated 29.06.2020, the respondents in the said appeals have approached the Supreme Court by preferring SLPs that are pending consideration. W.A. No.787 of 2019 Page 1 of 3
4. Mr. M.Surender Rao, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the respondent No.1/writ petitioner informs the court that aggrieved by the impugned interim order, the respondent No.6/M/s. Prime Properties has already moved an application for seeking vacation of the said order on which notice has been issued and pleadings have been directed to be completed.
5. Learned counsel for the parties state that the respondent No.l/writ petitioner has filed a contempt petition being aggrieved by the non-compliance of the impugned order dated 30.09.2019 against the appellant herein on which notice was issued on 30.04.2021 and the same is now listed on 09.07.2021.
6. As we are informed that the contempt petition filed by the respondent No.1/writ petitioner will be listed before another Bench, whereas the vacate stay application moved by the respondent No.6/M/s. Prime Properties will be listed before the Bench dealing with revenue matters, we are not in a position to direct both the matters to be listed before the same Bench. It is for the parties to make such a request.
7. At this stage, Mr. Surender Rao, learned Senior Advocate states on instructions that his client will not press the contempt petition till the vacate stay application moved by the respondent No.6/M/s. Prime Properties is heard and disposed of by the roster Bench. W.A. No.787 of 2019 Page 2 of 3
8. Satisfied by the above assurance, Mr. Parasaran, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant states that he does not wish to press the appeal.
9. The present appeal is accordingly disposed of along with the pending applications, if any.
_________________ HIMA KOHLI, CJ ______________________ B.VIJAYSEN REDDY, J 14.06.2021 Lrkm/pln W.A. No.787 of 2019 Page 3 of 3