HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT APPEAL No.591 of 2020
04.01.2021
Between:
Jangili Sattaiah
...Appellant
and
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department,
Hyderabad and 5 others.
...Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. R. Anurag Counsel for the respondents: Mr. T. Srikanth Reddy GP for Home The Court made the following:
2JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy) This writ appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 23.12.2020 passed by a learned Single in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.13187 of 2019, whereby the learned Single Judge, having found that the application in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.13187 of 2019 was not argued by the learned counsel for the appellant-writ petitioner, and time was sought again and again, stayed the operation of the interim order dated 27.09.2019 granted earlier.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, who has vehemently opposed grant of any interim order in this appeal.
Since the learned Single Judge did not extend the interim stay orders, as the learned counsel for the petitioner was not cooperating with hearing in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.13187 of 2019, we do not find any merit in this appeal.
The writ appeal is, accordingly, disposed of giving liberty to the appellant to file an application for extension of interim orders in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.13187 of 2019 by filing necessary application. However, if I.A.No.1 of 2019 or vacate stay petition, as the case may, are taken up for hearing by the learned Single Judge, the learned counsel for the appellant-writ petitioner shall argue the matter without taking any adjournment. There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, CJ __________________ B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J 04.01.2021 Lrkm