Abdul Wara, Nizamabad vs Shaik Abdul Rahman, Nizamabad ...

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 558 Tel
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2021

Telangana High Court
Abdul Wara, Nizamabad vs Shaik Abdul Rahman, Nizamabad ... on 24 February, 2021
Bench: Challa Kodanda Ram
             THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

               CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.133 of 2011


JUDGMENT:

This appeal is filed against the order dated 27.12.2010 passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, in W.C.No.166 of 2002 NF.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, and Sri Harinath Gupta, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent insurance company.

The only question which has been pressed for consideration is with regard to the date of payment of interest.

Whatever may be the position prior to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Oriental Insurance Company v. Siby George1, finality was given in Siby George (1 supra) with respect to the issue that compensation amount falls due and payable as on the date of accident. This was in line with the judgment of Supreme Court in Pratap Narain Singh Deo v. Srinivas Sabata2.

My learned brother Justice A. Rajasheker Reddy had elaborately considered all the judgments cited by both the appellants as well as respondents in C.M.A.No.871 of 2015, and by order dated 04.12.2015 had held that the appellant/claimant is entitled to interest at 12% per annum from the date of accident till the date of realisation. However, though the amount of compensation is due on the date of accident, the liability to pay interest arises only after one month from the date of accident. This is on account of Section 4A(3) of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923.

1 (2012) 12 SCC 540 2 (1976) 1 SCC 289 With respect to the contention of learned Standing Counsel for insurance company that the insurance company may not be mulcted with liability in cases where the appeal against the owner stood dismissed and the owner having not been made a party respondent, the said contention is liable to be rejected for the reason that the issue had already been dealt in C.M.A.No.871 of 2015, dated 04.12.2015, by referring to the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Meka Chakra Rao v. Yelubandi Babu Rao @ Reddemma3. The judgment of Division Bench being binding on this Court, and there being no reason for this Court to differ with the rationale in Meka Chakra, the contention of the learned Standing Counsel for insurance company is rejected.

Accordingly, the civil miscellaneous appeal stands disposed of. It is made clear that wherever the compensation amount has been deposited in pursuance of the orders of Commissioner, the payment of interest shall be reckoned from one month after the date of accident till the date of deposit. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. No costs.

_____________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J 24th February, 2021 ksm 3 2001 (1) ALD 453 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.133 of 2011 24th February, 2021 ksm