S. Madan vs The State Of Telangana

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 487 Tel
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2021

Telangana High Court
S. Madan vs The State Of Telangana on 19 February, 2021
Bench: G Sri Devi
           THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

                  WRIT PETITION No.26770 OF 2019

ORDER:

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners/A.2 to A.4 questioning the action of the respondents in not closing rowdy sheet opened against them on 21.01.2013 on the file of 3rd respondent-Bollaram Police Station.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents.

3. The grievance of the petitioners is that a rowdy sheet has been opened against them on 21.01.2013 on the file of 3rd respondent-Bollaram Police Station based on a single compliant, which was registered as a case in Crime No.85 of 2012 for the offence punishable under Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code, which ultimately resulted in acquittal of the petitioners by the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for trial of Communal Offence Cases-cum-VII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, vide its Judgment, dated 01.10.2015, in Sessions Case No.355 of 2014.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that this Court has already closed the rowdy sheet opened against accused No.1 in Crime No.85 of 2012 and the case of the petitioners also stands on the same footing. He further stated that except the aforesaid crime, there is no crime registered against the petitioners 2 GSD,J wp_26770_2019 and ultimately, prayed this Court to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioners herein on 21.01.2013.

5. A counter affidavit has been filed by respondent No.3, wherein it is stated that Crime No.85 of 2012 was registered on the file of Bollaram Police Station against the petitioners herein and another under Section 436 I.P.C, which resulted in acquittal, as stated above.

6. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that the main intention of the petitioners are to get the rowdy sheet closed against them so that they would continue their unlawful activities and as such no indulgence by this Court is required to be shown.

7. Insofar as opening of a rowdy sheet is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioners drew the attention of this Court to the Judgment reported in M.Malla Reddy v. State of Telangana and others1, wherein this Court had gone into the details as to when a rowdy sheet can be opened and continued. This Court in the said decision had considered in detail the relevant provision for the purpose of adjudication of the issue and by referring to the A.P Police Standing Order-601 had indicated in what circumstances, a rowdy sheet can be opened. The Hon'ble Court further observed that except in cases, which are covered by the exceptions provided under the said Standing Orders, for a mere single offence, the authorities are not empowered to open a rowdy sheet. He also submitted that persons who habitually commit, attempt to commit or abet the commission of offence involving a 1 2016 (1) ALD (Crl.) 591 3 GSD,J wp_26770_2019 breach of the peace, disturbance to public order and security, a rowdy sheet can be opened.

8. In the present case, since the offence with which the petitioners are charged is under Section 436 I.P.C., which is one of the exceptions carved out for opening of a rowdy sheet, the contention of the petitioners that for a single offence, rowdy sheet cannot be opened does not merit consideration. However, considering the fact that the said complaint, which resulted in a case being registered as Sessions Case No.355 of 2014, was ended in acquittal on 01.10.2015 and no other cases are pending against the petitioners as per the counter of respondent No.3, interference of this Court is called for, as there is no requirement to continue the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner on 21.01.2013. Therefore, the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioners is liable to be closed.

9. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed and the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioners on 21.01.2013 by the 3rd respondent-Station House Officer, Bollaram Police Station in respect of Crime No.85 of 2012, is hereby closed. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________ JUSTICE G SRI DEVI 19th February, 2021 YVL 4 GSD,J wp_26770_2019 THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.26770 OF 2019 Date:19.02.2021 YVL