Telangana High Court
Sabera Begum vs The State Of Telangana on 1 December, 2021
Bench: Satish Chandra Sharma, N.Tukaramji
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI
WRIT APPEAL No.877 of 2019
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)
Learned counsel for the appellant has stated before this
Court that he has no instructions in the matter.
The facts of the case are that a writ petition i.e.,
W.P.No.23736 of 2019 was preferred before this Court by the
appellant/writ petitioner stating that her husband was
assigned land to an extent of Acs.5.00 guntas in Sy.No.233 of
Jalpally Village, Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. After
the death of her husband, proceedings dated 05.02.2002 were
issued in her name. She has stated that her name was
deleted and she is in possession of the land. The learned
Single Judge has passed an order holding that in case
mutation order was passed and the name of the writ
petitioner was deleted, she does have a remedy to prefer an
appeal.
In the considered opinion of this Court, in case the
name of the writ petitioner was deleted from the revenue
records, the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass
Books Act, 2020, provides for a remedy and the learned
Single Judge has disposed of the writ petition with a liberty to
the writ petitioner to work out her remedies on the issue of
mutation/restoration of her name in the revenue records.
2
This Court does not find any reason to interfere with the
order passed by the learned Single Judge.
The writ appeal is, therefore, disposed of with the liberty
as granted by the learned Single Judge.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________________________
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ
______________________________
N. TUKARAMJI, J
01.12.2021
ES