Items No.9-10
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
F.C.A.Nos.200 & 179 of 2018
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hima Kohli)
1. Mr. S. Vijaya Prashanth, learned counsel for the
respondent/husband states on instructions from his client, who is
present in the virtual hearing, that his client is willing to pay a onetime alimony of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees fifteen lakhs only) to the appellant/wife, instead of offering an immovable property to her, as its value has yet to be established. He seeks two months' time to pay the entire amount.
2. Mr. R. Nagarjuna Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant/wife is agreeable to receiving the aforesaid amount towards a full and final settlement within a period of two months.
3. With the consent of the parties, the following schedule is drawn for the respondent/husband to pay to the appellant/wife, a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- in full and final settlement of all her claims by depositing the same into her account through RTGS for which the details of her bank account shall be furnished by learned counsel for the appellant/wife to the other side:-
Sl.No. Amount Rs. On or before
1. 3,00,000/- 17.08.2021
2. 4,00,000/- 31.08.2021
3. 4,00,000/- 14.09.2021
4. 4,00,000/- 28.09.2021
F.C.A.Nos.200&179 of 2018 Page 1 of 2
Any default in paying the instalments will attract interest at the rate of 12% per annum to be paid along with the next instalment.
4. The appellant/wife agrees that on receiving the aforesaid amount, no further amount shall be claimed by her from the respondent/husband on any account whatsoever and the same shall be treated as a onetime settlement between the parties.
5. While binding the parties to the statements recorded hereinabove, both the appeals are disposed of along with the pending applications, if any. It is made clear that any default on the part of the respondent/husband in making the payment to the appellant/wife will result in forfeiture of the amounts already paid and also entitle the appellant/wife to seek revival of the present appeals.
______________________________ HIMA KOHLI, CJ ______________________________ B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J 03.08.2021 JSU/vs F.C.A.Nos.200&179 of 2018 Page 2 of 2