Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Inderjeet Yadav vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 19 February, 2026
Author: Nupur Bhati
Bench: Nupur Bhati
[2026:RJ-JD:9273]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4055/2026
Inderjeet Yadav S/o Bhola Ram Yadav, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
Village Momanpur Talwar, Post Jaguwas, Tehsil Behror, District
Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,
Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kotputli-Behror.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
Order 19/02/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset submits that identically situated person, namely, Mr. Vinod Kumar Chobisa, has been accorded notional benefits from 28th January, 2008, whereas the petitioners, who were identically situated, have been declined the same treatment and thus, the action of the State- respondents is discriminatory and in violation to the mandate of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
2. Learned counsel further submits that for the present, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation within a time frame in the backdrop of order dated 7th May, 2013, wherein benefits on notional basis have been accorded to Mr. Vinod Kumar Chobisa.
(Uploaded on 19/02/2026 at 01:46:23 PM) (Downloaded on 19/02/2026 at 08:53:10 PM) [2026:RJ-JD:9273] (2 of 2) [CW-4055/2026]
3. In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation to the respondents within two weeks hereinafter.
4. In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(DR.NUPUR BHATI),J surabhii/177- (Uploaded on 19/02/2026 at 01:46:23 PM) (Downloaded on 19/02/2026 at 08:53:10 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)