Cheemaram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:22014)

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 488 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Cheemaram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:22014) on 7 May, 2025

Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
                                   [2025:RJ-JD:22014]

                                         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                                                          JODHPUR
                                                  S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 434/2024

                                   Cheemaram S/o Ramlal, Aged About 69 Years, R/o House No.
                                   1292,     Sector     3,     New      Housing        Board,       Rewadi        (Haryana),
                                   Presently R/o Jambheshwar Nagar, Murlidhar Vyas Nagar Ke
                                   Pass, Bikaner.
                                                                                                                ----Appellant
                                                                            Versus
                                   1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                   2.       Vijendra Pal @ Vijendra Shakya S/o Lakhanram Shakya,
                                            R/o    Ingine       Assembly         Plant,      Hero        Moto    Corp.   Ltd,
                                            Dharuheda, Dist. Rewadi, Haryana.
                                                                                                           ----Respondents


                                   For Appellant(s)               :     Mr. SK Verma
                                   For Respondent(s)              :     Mr. S.S. Rathore, Dy.G.A.


                                                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order 07/05/2025

1. Upon perusal of the judgment impugned, it is revealing that a cheque was allegedly given by the accused-respondent to the petitioner, which upon presentation got dishonoured with the remark 'Drawers Signatures Differs". There seems reasonable grounds to allow the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned judgment.

2. Accordingly, the instant application seeking leave to appeal is allowed. The memo of leave to appeal application shall be treated and registered as an appeal.

3. Office to proceed.

(FARJAND ALI),J 77-divya/-

(Downloaded on 08/05/2025 at 09:42:44 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)