Anita vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:28344)

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1631 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Anita vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:28344) on 1 July, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:28344]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1907/2025

1.       Anita W/o Prem Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, D/o
         Gopiram, R/o Ward No.12, Gouron, Ka Mohalla, Satyun,
         District Churu, At Present Residing At Ward No. 08,
         Surajansar, District Hanumangarh.
2.       Satveer Hooda S/o Jagdish, Aged About 24 Years, R/o
         Ward No. 08, Surajansar, District Hanumangarh.
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                      Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
         Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       Superintendent Of Police, Hanumangarh.
3.       Sho, Khuyian Police Staton, District Hanumangarh.
4.       Prem Kumar S/o Khyaliram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
         Ward No.12, Gouron, Ka Mohalla, Satyun, District Churu.
5.       Gopiram Goswami S/o Krishan Ram, Aged About 60
         Years,      R/o   Village     Jhedasar,        District   Hanumangarh,
         Rajasthan.
6.       Dinesh Goswami S/o Gopiram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o
         Village Jhedasar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
7.       Dharma Thori S/o Charanaram Thori, Aged About 25
         Years,      R/o   Village     Jhedasar,        District   Hanumangarh,
         Rajasthan.
8.       Kesraram Goswami S/o Kashi Ram, Aged About 28 Years,
         R/o Village Devasar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
9.       Bharataram Goswami S/o Krishan Ram, Aged About 58
         Years,      R/o   Village     Jhedasar,        District   Hanumangarh,
         Rajasthan.
10.      Gorishankar Goswami S/o Krishan Ram, Aged About 50
         Years,      R/o   Village     Jhedasar,        District   Hanumangarh,
         Rajasthan.
11.      Sharwan Goswami S/o Ganpati Giri, Aged About 35 Years,
         R/o Village Devasar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
12.      Devilal Goswami S/o Khyaliram, Aged About 35 Years, R/
         o Ward No.12, Gouron, Ka Mohalla, Satyun, District Churu
13.      Daleep Goswami S/o Chimin Giri, Aged About 50 Years,


                       (Downloaded on 02/07/2025 at 09:42:59 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:28344]                    (2 of 3)                      [CRLW-1907/2025]


         R/o Village Satyun, District Churu
14.      Shishpal Goswami S/o Ganpati Giri, Aged About 35 Years,
         R/o Village Devasar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
15.      Balveer Goswami S/o Sharwan Goswami, Aged About 45
         Years, R/o Village Bhompura, District Hanumangarh,
         Rajasthan.
16.      Jassaram Goswami S/o Sharwan Goswami, Aged About
         40 Years, R/o Village Bhompura, District Hanumangarh,
         Rajasthan.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Kishan Lal
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order 01/07/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of (Downloaded on 02/07/2025 at 09:42:59 PM) [2025:RJ-JD:28344] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1907/2025] Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 236-himanshu/-

(Downloaded on 02/07/2025 at 09:42:59 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)