Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Sunil Bishnoi vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:4188) on 22 January, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:4188]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1498/2025
Sunil Bishnoi S/o Shri Bhinya Ram Bishnoi, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o Sewalo Ki Dhani, Palasani Via Banar, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director Cum Special
Secretary, Directorate Of Local Self Department,
Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sojat, District Pali Through Its
Chairman.
3. Purushottam Panwar, Working As Executive Officer,
Municipal Board, Bagru, District Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Panwar, Sr. Adv. & AAG
assisted by Mr. Ayush Gehlot.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order (Oral) 22/01/2025
1. Petitioner is before this Court assailing an order dated 15.01.2025 (Annex.8), vide which the petitioner was made APO and respondent No.3 was transferred in place of petitioner.
2. Apart from other arguments, primarily, the entire edifice of filing the petition and the emphasis during the course of arguments is that the impugned order is in violation of Rule 25-A of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also learned Senior Counsel and learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondents, prima facie, it does (Downloaded on 22/01/2025 at 09:58:36 PM) [2025:RJ-JD:4188] (2 of 2) [CW-1498/2025] appear that not only the impugned order is in violation of Rule 25, ibid, but also judgment rendered in Ramesh Kumar Parihar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3053/2021.
4. Confronted with the aforesaid observation of this Court, learned Senior Counsel very candidly states that he will instruct his clients to pass remedial orders qua petitioner within 3 days from today and the petitioner shall be assigned a specific place of posting.
5. In view of the aforesaid, petition is disposed of with the expectation that, as stated by learned Senior Counsel and AAG, the competent authority shall pass the order within 3 days and petitioner shall be assigned duties in accordance with law.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA),J
74-/Jitender/Dhananjay
Whether fit for reporting : Yes / No.
(Downloaded on 22/01/2025 at 09:58:36 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)