Raman Singh Charpota vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:86)

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3679 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Raman Singh Charpota vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:86) on 2 January, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:86]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20172/2024

1.       Raman Singh Charpota S/o Shri Narsingh Charpota, Aged
         About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Nani Ka Sath, Post
         Lohariya     Bada,      Tehsil      Kushalgarh,            District   Banswara
         (Rajasthan).
2.       Ashok Kumar Meena S/o Shri Badri Lal Meena, Aged
         About     49    Years,      Resident        Of     Village      Kandal,   Post
         Khanmin, Tehsil Kherwara, District Udaipur (Rajasthan).
3.       Kanhaiya Lal Ninama S/o Shri Soma Lal Ninama, Aged
         About 57 Years, Resident Of Nearby Police Chowki,
         Vagdiyafala, Kushalgarh, District Banswara (Rajasthan).
4.       Praveen Kumar Kharadi S/o Shri Khaturam Kharadi, Aged
         About 41 Years, Resident Of Village Chittoda Mafi, Post
         Dungra Bada, Tehsil And Panchayat Samiti Sajjangarh,
         District Banswara (Rajasthan).
5.       Ramila Bhagora W/o Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 56 Years,
         Resident Of Village Bavalipada, Post Machharasath, Tehsil
         Sajjangarh, District Banswara (Rajasthan).
6.       Phool Chand Maida S/o Shri Vesta Maida, Aged About 48
         Years, Resident Of Village Darra, Post Chhoti Sarwa,
         Tehsil Kushalgarh, District Banswara (Rajasthan).
7.       Narendra Kumar S/o Shri Manji Dodiyaar, Aged About 48
         Years, Resident Of Angoriya, Tehsil Kushalgarh, District
         Banswara (Rajasthan).
8.       Balwant Singh Labana S/o Shri Kalu Singh Labana, Aged
         About 46 Years, Resident Of Village Tanda-Ratna, Post
         Sajjangarh,        Tehsil       Kushalgarh,            District       Banswara
         (Rajasthan).
9.       Bhagwanti Katara D/o Shri Bheem Singh Katara, Wife Of
         Jeevardhan, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Maharshi
         Dayanand Sevashram, Rati Talai, Banswara Rural, District
         Banswara (Rajasthan).
10.      Kailash Chandra S/o Shri Babu Lal, Aged About 48 Years,
         Resident Of A/1, Pushpa Nagar, Banswara Rural, District
         Banswara (Rajasthan).
                                                                         ----Petitioners
                                       Versus


                        (Downloaded on 03/01/2025 at 11:23:25 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:86]                         (2 of 3)                       [CW-20172/2024]


1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
         Of Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan,
         Jaipur.
2.       The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission,
         Ajmer.
3.       Director, Elementary Education Bikaner (Rajasthan).
4.       Joint     Director,       Elementary       Education,      Udaipur   Zone,
         Udaipur (Rajasthan).
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :    Mr. Vikram Sharma.
For Respondent(s)              :    Mr. K.K. Rawal with
                                    Mr. Mudit Bhachhawat.



                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Order 02/01/2025

1. Petitioners herein are before this Court seeking directions to the respondents to give the benefit of seniority, fixation and notional benefit as was given to the candidates, who were selected / appointed for the post of Teacher Grade-III pursuant to the order dated 04.02.2006.

2. At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered an order dated 16.07.2014 passed by the Jaipur Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7283/2014 : Manoj Khandelwal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. He submits that the petitioners are sanguine that, in case they are allowed to file a representation qua the grievance raised in the present writ petition and the same is considered by the respondents in light of (Downloaded on 03/01/2025 at 11:23:25 PM) [2025:RJ-JD:86] (3 of 3) [CW-20172/2024] the aforesaid judgment, they will be meted out with favorable treatment.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents is also agreeable to the aforesaid suggestion made by learned counsel for the petitioners.

4. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation (may file fresh, if not already filed) of the petitioners, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made in the case of Manoj Khandelwal (supra), as expeditiously as possible.

5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

(ARUN MONGA),J 2-/Jitender/Rmathur (Downloaded on 03/01/2025 at 11:23:25 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)