Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Meera Gurjar vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:52239) on 3 December, 2025
Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:52239]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2954/2025
1. Meera Gurjar D/o Bhoma Ram Gurjar, Aged About 19
Years, Motras Tehsil Aasind District Bhilwara At Present
Modi Mangri Tehsil Bandor Akhegarh Bhilwara Raj.
2. Laxman Gurjar S/o Udaram, Aged About 21 Years, Modi
Mangri Tehsil Badnor Akhegarh District Bhilwara
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Thought Chief Secretary Department
Of Home Affairs Jaipur
2. Superintendent Of Police, Bhilwara
3. Station House Officer, Police Station Shambhugarh District
Bhilwara
4. Ladu Devi W/o Bhoma Ram Gurjar, Motras Tehsil Aasind
District Bhilwara Bhilwara
5. Bhoma Ram S/o Tara Ji, Motras Tehsil Aasind District
Bhilwara
6. Chagan Gurjar S/o Tejmal Gurjar, Kali Kheda P S
Shambhugarh District Bhilwara
7. Ganesh Gurjar S/o Harlal, Pathan Shambhugarh Tehsil
Aasind District Bhilwara
8. Bhopal Gurjar S/o Late Shri Dhanaji, Motras Tehsil Aasind
District Bhilwara
9. Dalu Ram Gurjar, Lamba Pathan Shumbhgarh Tehsil
Aasind Tehsil District Bhilwara
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pukhraj Gehlot
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order 03/12/2025 (Uploaded on 03/12/2025 at 06:41:29 PM) (Downloaded on 03/12/2025 at 07:42:21 PM) [2025:RJ-JD:52239] (2 of 2) [CRLW-2954/2025] The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 415-himanshu/-
(Uploaded on 03/12/2025 at 06:41:29 PM) (Downloaded on 03/12/2025 at 07:42:21 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)