Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Narendra Kumar vs Rajasthan State Road Transport ... on 23 September, 2024
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2024:RJ-JD:39388]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16058/2022
1. Narendra Kumar S/o Sh. Bhadur Ram, Aged About 44
Years, Resident Of 44 Ps Uttam Singh Wala, Tehsil And
District Hanumangarh.
2. Nahar Singh S/o Sh. Gotam Singh, Aged About 41 Years,
Resident Of Nai Basti Mukam, Chundiyawala Post Kheda
Samor, District Dungarpur.
3. Gograj Singh S/o Sh. Kalluram, Aged About 46 Years,
Resident Of Dhani Machhawali Kotri Dhaylan, District
Sikar.
4. Rampal Singh S/o Sh. Sultan Singh, Aged About 47 Years,
Resident Of Village Gothra, District Jhunjhunu.
5. Karan Singh S/o Sh. Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 45
Years, Resident Of Ravo Ka Mohala, Barna, Kishangarh,
District Ajmer.
6. Hari Singh S/o Sh. Ramjilal, Aged About 47 Years, Vpo
Goriya, Tehsil Khandela District Sikar.
7. Sajan Kumar Yadav S/o Sh. Bhagirath Prasad, Aged About
47 Years, Resident Of Village Divrala, Tehsil Sri Madhopur,
District Sikar.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through
Managing Director, Head Quarter Parivahan Marg, Chomu
House, Jaipur.
2. The Executive Director (Administration), Rajasthan State
Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Choumu
House, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport
Corporation, Anupgarh Depot, District Sri Ganganagar.
4. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport
Corporation, Deluxe Depot Jaipur.
5. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport
Corporation, Sri Madhopur Depot, District Sikar.
6. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport
Corporation, Dungarpur Depot, Dungarpur.
----Respondents
(Downloaded on 24/09/2024 at 09:03:44 PM)
[2024:RJ-JD:39388] (2 of 3) [CW-16058/2022]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shardul Singh
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Avin Chhangani
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order 23/09/2024
1. Learned counsel for the respondent -Corporation submits that prayer for which the petition has been preferred has been refused by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide its judgment dated 13.02.2020 passed by Jaipur Bench of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sharma Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.24/2020 and the same has been affirmed by Division Bench of this Court vide its judgment dated 12.01.2022 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 556/2020 : Ram Kumar Sharma Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has tried to distinguish the facts of the present case with the above judgments, however, this Court hardly finds any distinction.
3. In view of the aforesaid and following the above referred judgments, the present writ petition is dismissed.
4. The stay application as well as other pending applications stand disposed of.
5. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only (Downloaded on 24/09/2024 at 09:03:44 PM) [2024:RJ-JD:39388] (3 of 3) [CW-16058/2022] in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioners would be entitled to the relief.
6. All pending applications stand disposed of.
(FARJAND ALI),J 149-Samvedana/-
(Downloaded on 24/09/2024 at 09:03:44 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)