Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Ramesh Kumar vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 7 October, 2024
Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2024:RJ-JD:40809]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16480/2024
Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Narender Kumar, Aged About 54 Years,
R/o Ward No. 6, Tehsil - Tibbi, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Medical
And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
2. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health
Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. The Mission Director, National Health Mission, Directorate
Of Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Nhm
Headquarter, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme,
Jaipur.
5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh.
6. The Medical Officer In-Charge, Community Health Center,
Tibbi District Hanumangarh.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.S.Bhaleria.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S.Rajpurohit, AAG assisted by
Ms Anita Rajpurohit.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order 07/10/2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a judgment rendered by this court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12243/2024 (Shruti Moyal & Ors. V/s State of (Downloaded on 08/10/2024 at 09:49:40 PM) [2024:RJ-JD:40809] (2 of 4) [CW-16480/2024] Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 30.07.2024 in the following terms:-
"1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"A. the action of the respondents while terminating the services of the petitioners from the post of Assistant Radiographer, Lab Technician and Assistant lab Technician on the ground of availability of regularly selected Lab Technicians despite the fact that posts are still lying vacant, may kindly be declared per se illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Constitution of India.
B. The impugned orders dated 12.07.2014 (Annexure-
7) may kindly be quashed and set aside.
C. The impugned termination order of petitioner No.1 dated 10.07.2024 (Annexure-8) and order dated 10.07.2024 (Annexure-9) by which services of petitioners No.1 have been terminated and all orders issued by the respondents in the intervening period, terminating the services of the petitioners, may kindly be ordered to be quashed and set aside.
D. the respondents may kindly be directed to reinstate the services of the petitioners and they be permitted to continue their services on their respective post. E. The respondents may kindly be directed not to replace the petitioners till the agreement of the petitioners come to an end.
F. That the respondents may be restrained from dis- continuing services of the petitioners and/or the present place of posting of the petitioners may not changed."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were appointed on the urgent temporary basis for a period of 3 months or till the regularly selected employees are available with the respondent-Department, whichever is earlier. Learned counsel submits that the regularly selected employees are available with the respondent-Department, thus, the services (Downloaded on 08/10/2024 at 09:49:40 PM) [2024:RJ-JD:40809] (3 of 4) [CW-16480/2024] of the petitioners have been dispensed with vide order dated 10.07.2024.
4. Learned counsel further submits that after the regularly selected persons having joined in the respondent-Department, still there are number of vacancies available with the respondent-Department for the post of Lab Technician and Assistant Radiographers. He, therefore, prays that the respondents may be directed that in case, there are vacancies available in the Department and they are in need of services of the petitioners, the petitioners' services can be adjusted in the nearby areas of District Pali/Beawar.
5. Considering the limited prayer of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.7- Chief Medical and Health Officer, Beawar & respondent No.8- Chief Medical and Health Officer, Pali to ascertain the number of vacancies available with them in their jurisdiction and if they desire to take the services of the petitioners on the post available, the petitioners may be adjusted or accommodated to serve on those posts till the regularly selected candidates are available with the respondent-Department.
6. It is made clear that if any of the petitioner is not discharging his duties satisfactorily, the respondents will be free to discharge him from the employment.
7. Stay petition as well as other pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of".
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to file an appropriate representation before the respondents in the light of judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Shruti Moyal (supra) for redressal of his grievances.
4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms that in the event of filing a representation by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondents at the earliest preferably within a period of four (Downloaded on 08/10/2024 at 09:49:40 PM) [2024:RJ-JD:40809] (4 of 4) [CW-16480/2024] weeks from the date of receipt of such representation, keeping in mind the law laid down by this Court in the case of Shruti Moyal (supra).
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 65-Anil Singh/-
(Downloaded on 08/10/2024 at 09:49:40 PM)Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)