Rajasthan High Court
Chetan Saini S/O Shri Ramesh Chand Saini vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:43888) on 19 October, 2024
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2024:RJ-JP:43888]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6434/2024
1. Chetan Saini S/o Shri Ramesh Chand Saini, Aged About
23 Years, R/o Village Maliwada, Police Station Kalwar,
District Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. Chandra Prakash S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Bijaraniya Ka Bas, Bhaislana, Jobner, District
Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3. Aasin Khan S/o Shri Pappu Khan, Aged About 22 Years,
R/o Plot No. 83, Ishwar Nagar, Kalwar, District Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Badal Choudhary S/o Rajkumar, R/o 41, Boyatwala,
Kardhani, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3. Roshan Choudhary S/o Dinesh Choudhary, R/o 41,
Boyatwala, Benar, Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur,
( Rajasthan).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Swadesh Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 19/10/2024
1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a prayer to quash the FIR No. 162/2024 registered at Police Station Kalwar District Jaipur (West) for offences under Sections 323, 341, 365, 337 of IPC, on the basis of compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute.
2. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been resolved by the parties amicably.
3. Heard and considered.
(Downloaded on 24/10/2024 at 09:56:01 PM)
[2024:RJ-JP:43888] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6434/2024]
4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced below:
"12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non- compoundable."
5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition. Compromise is taken on record.
6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 162/2024 registered at Police Station Kalwar District Jaipur (West) with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/35 (Downloaded on 24/10/2024 at 09:56:01 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)