Mangi Lal vs Sunita (2024:Rj-Jd:23910-Db)

Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Mangi Lal vs Sunita (2024:Rj-Jd:23910-Db) on 27 May, 2024

Bench: Dinesh Mehta, Rajendra Prakash Soni

[2024:RJ-JD:23910-DB]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                D.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1246/2024

Mangi Lal S/o Shri Shankar Lal Kumhar, Aged About 27 Years, R/
o Gadhwali Mohalla, Gali No. 5, Rampura Basti, Lalgarh, Dist.
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
                                                                           ----Appellant
                                       Versus
Sunita W/o Mangi Lal, D/o Haru Ram Kumhar, R/o Panchshati
Circle, Sadulganj, Dist. Bikaner, Rajasthan.
                                                                         ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)             :     Mr. S.K.Verma
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Kaushal Gautam



               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI Order 27/05/2024

1. The present civil misc. appeal has been preferred against judgment and decree dated 07.12.2023 passed by learned Family Court No.2, Bikaner, whereby the petition under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 preferred by the present appellant (husband) has been rejected.

2. Mr. Kaushal Gautam, learned counsel for the respondent (wife), at the outset, submitted that in the changed circumstances, the wife has come to a conclusion that it is neither possible nor feasible to continue the matrimony with the appellant and in order to buy peace, she would prefer a decree of divorce.

3. Mr. Gautam, learned counsel for the respondent (wife), on instruction, submitted that as the respondent (wife) is earning (Downloaded on 27/05/2024 at 08:57:06 PM) [2024:RJ-JD:23910-DB] (2 of 2) [CMA-1246/2024] sufficiently, she does not want to take any alimony from the appellant (husband).

4. In view of the aforesaid, more particularly, on the basis of the consent given by the counsel for the respondent (wife), the present appeal is allowed without adjudication on merit.

5. The marriage of the appellant (husband) and respondent (wife) which took place on 03.11.2014 is hereby dissolved. The decree of divorce be issued in accordance with law. (RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J (DINESH MEHTA),J 8-akansha/-

(Downloaded on 27/05/2024 at 08:57:06 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)