Dr. Yugal Kishore Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:23669)

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Dr. Yugal Kishore Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:23669) on 24 May, 2024

[2024:RJ-JD:23669]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                   S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8394/2024

1.       Dr. Yugal Kishore Sharma S/o Shri Chaturbhuj Sharma,
         Aged About 65 Years, R/o 29, Samaprit Complex Pula,
         District Udaipur (Raj.). (Ex Associate Professor).
2.       Dr. Vidhya Acharya D/o Shri Pratap Lal Acharya, Aged
         About 65 Years, R/o 53, Prem Nagar, Inside Kesav Nagar,
         Girwa, Udaipur (Raj.). (Ex Associate Professor).
                                                                        ----Petitioners
                                         Versus
1.       State       Of    Rajasthan,          Through          The    Secretary    To
         Department Of Higher Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan,
         Jaipur.
2.       Commissioner, College Education Department Of Higher
         Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.       Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners Welfare
         Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4.       Principal,       Seth       Mathuradas           Binani      Govt.   College,
         Nathdwara, Dist. Rajsamand (Raj.).
                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Mukesh Vyas
For Respondent(s)              :     ----



               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Order 24/05/2024

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by an order passed by this Court in case of Vijay Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21/2020, decided on 21.07.2023. He submits that the respondents may be directed to consider the representation of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid judgment.

(Downloaded on 28/05/2024 at 08:40:04 PM)

[2024:RJ-JD:23669] (2 of 2) [CW-8394/2024]

2. In view of the aforesaid submission, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioners, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made in the case of Vijay Singh (supra), as expeditiously as possible.

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(ARUN MONGA),J 12-DhananjayS/-

(Downloaded on 28/05/2024 at 08:40:04 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)