Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Dal Chand Nayak vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:23661) on 24 May, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:23661]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8386/2024
1. Dal Chand Nayak S/o Kishan Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/
o Mukam Post-Jitawas, Via-Kuranj, Tehsil And District-
Rajsamand.
2. Gunvant Jain S/o Prabhu Lal Jain, Aged About 39 Years,
R/o Near Railway Station, Fatehnagar, Changedi, Tehsil
And District-Udaipur.
3. Madhav Lal Sirwee S/o Bheru Lal, Aged About 43 Years,
R/o Sirwee Basti, Meghakheda, Post-Pipli Ahiran,
Railmagra, District-Rajsamand.
4. Vishnu Sunita Ben D/o Nana Das, Aged About 45 Years,
R/o Mukam Post Kabra, Via-Dariba, Railmagra, District-
Rajsamand.
5. Kailash Chandra Vaishnav S/o Kishan Das Vaishnav, Aged
About 45 Years, R/o Village-Kumariya Kheda, Near
Charbhuja Mandir, Post-Namana, Tehsil-Nathdwara,
District-Rajsamand.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Rural
Development And Panchayati Raj Department,
Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati
Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Rajsamand, District-
Rajsamand.
4. Vikash Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti Rajsamand, District-
Rajsamand.
5. Vikash Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti Railmagra, District-
Rajsamand.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramesh Kumar
For Respondent(s) : --
(Downloaded on 27/05/2024 at 08:44:10 PM)
[2024:RJ-JD:23661] (2 of 2) [CW-8386/2024]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order 24/05/2024
1. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by an order passed by this Court in case of Mohan Lal Meghwal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15764/2021, decided on 08.12.2022. He submits that the respondents may be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment.
2. In view of the submissions made, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made in the case of Mohan Lal Meghwal (supra), as expeditiously as possible.
(ARUN MONGA),J 10-skm/-
(Downloaded on 27/05/2024 at 08:44:10 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)