Smt. Radha Kanwar D/O Shri Nepal Singh ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:21442)

Rajasthan High Court

Smt. Radha Kanwar D/O Shri Nepal Singh ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:21442) on 7 May, 2024

Author: Anil Kumar Upman

Bench: Anil Kumar Upman

[2024:RJ-JP:21442]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

                S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 921/2024

1.       Smt. Radha Kanwar D/o Shri Nepal Singh W/o Gopal
         Singh, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Aspura Mohalla,
         Basai, Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh. Presently Residing
         With Live- In- Partner Dilip Kumar S/o Sitaram, At
         Khokhariya Khurd, Maralwada, Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
2.       Dilip Kumar S/o Sitaram, Aged About 23 Years, Resident
         Of Khokhariya Khurd, Maralwada, Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
                                                                    ----Petitioners
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur.

3. Superintendent Of Police, Jhalawar, Rajasthan.

4. Station House Officer, Police Station Pagaria, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.

5. Gopal Singh S/o Sajjan Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Of Aspura, Tehsil Sitamau, P/s Sharara, District Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh.

6. Nepal Singh S/o Mander Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Salari, Tehsil Garoth, P/s Shamgarh, District Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh.

7. Guman Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Salari, Tehsil Garoth, P/s Shamgarh, District Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh.

8. Govind Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Salari, Tehsil Garoth, P/s Shamgarh, District Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh.

                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Pallav Sharma
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP


           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
                                      Order

07/05/2024

1. Petitioners are present in person and they have duly been identified by their counsel.

(Downloaded on 24/05/2024 at 09:44:13 PM) [2024:RJ-JP:21442] (2 of 3) [CRLW-921/2024]

2. Petitioners have preferred instant petition for issuance of necessary directions to official-respondents to provide adequate security and protection to them on the ground that they are facing grave threat of their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.

3. Counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners in order to live happily and peacefully are seeking protection qua private respondents, who are not happy with the relationship of petitioners.

4. Pursuant the judgment of the Apex Court in case of Navtej Singh Johar V. Union of India [(2018)10 SCC 1] and of this court in Bajrang Lal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan, SB Cr. Miscellaneous Petition No.2/2019 decided on 4-1-2019, the State Government through Director General of Police issued a Circular dated 18-1-2019 and appointed Nodal Officer at every Police Station in the State of Rajasthan for ventilation of grievances of newly married couple, including for adequate protection. Life and liberty is fundamental right of every citizen being part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, petitioners deserve protection of their life and liberty in accordance with law.

5. Similar to the married couple, petitioners, who are major and willingly living in relationship, without entering into marriage, also cannot be denied protection of their life and liberty since it is fundamental right of every citizen being part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India as has been observed by this Apex Court in case of S.Khushboo Vs. Kanniammal [(2010)5 SCC 600] and (Downloaded on 24/05/2024 at 09:44:13 PM) [2024:RJ-JP:21442] (3 of 3) [CRLW-921/2024] Joseph Shine Vs. Union of India [(2019)3 SCC 39]. Thus, petitioners deserve protection of their life and liberty in accordance with law.

6. In view of above, however, this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction is not inclined to enter into examining the validity of marriage/legality of relationship of parties, therefore does not render any affirmation of legality and validity of the status of parties, under which they are living together, but keeping in mind the proposition of law set forth by the Apex Court in catena of judgments and in order to protect fundamental rights of parties for their life and liberty, guaranteed under the Constitution, this petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to approach the concerned Nodal Officer for ventilation of their grievances.

7. In case petitioners move any application, it is expected from the concerned Nodal Officer to take necessary action for not allowing to illegally hinder in peaceful life and liberty of petitioners by private respondents, who are not agreeable to the relationship of petitioners, but after verifying the fact, if required.

8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.

9. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /4 (Downloaded on 24/05/2024 at 09:44:13 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)