Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.
Rajasthan High Court
Rameshwar Sharma S/O Mool Chand Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:20652) on 2 May, 2024
Author: Ganesh Ram Meena
Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena
[2024:RJ-JP:20652]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6598/2024
1. Rameshwar Sharma S/o Mool Chand Sharma, Aged About
63 Years, R/o Santosh Nagar, Bamor Road, District Tonk,
Rajasthan, Aadhar No.- 6997 2533 8484, (Retired On
30.6.2021)
2. Kailash Chand Joshi S/o Ramgopal Joshi, Aged About 72
Years, Baghera, Ajmer, Aadhar No. 7865 6822 2340,
(Retired On 30.06.2012)
3. Madan Lal Sharma S/o Shiv Villas Sharma, Aged About 70
Years, R/o Mo Teliyan Ke Raste Ke Piche, Purani Tonk,
District Tonk, Rajasthan, Aadhar No. 5195 2960 3723,
(Retired On 30.06.2011)
4. Farid Ahmed S/o Mohd Irfan Khan, Aged About 73 Years,
R/o Mohalla Gol, Near Nala Bairwan, District Tonk,
Rajasthan, Aadhar No. 4263 8256 2006, (Retired On
30.06.2011)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Finance, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government
Secretariat, Jaipur
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan,
Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Power, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government
Secretariat, Jaipur
4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Agriculture, Govt. Of Rajasthan,
Government Secretariat, Jaipur
5. Commissioner, Agriculture Department, Pant Krishi
Bhawan, Jaipur
6. Cmd Jvvnl, Vidyut Bhawan Janpath, Jaipur
7. Cmd Rrvpnl, Bais Godam, Sahkar Marg, Jaipur
8. Director, Pension And Pensioners' Welfare Department
Rajasthan Jaipur
(Downloaded on 17/05/2024 at 09:27:16 PM)
[2024:RJ-JP:20652] (2 of 4) [CW-6598/2024]
9. Director, Secondary Education Department Rajasthan
Bikaner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
02/05/2024
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by
the Division Bench judgment in the case of Ramesh Chander
Gupta Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ
Petition No. 2800/2021) and other connected matters,
decided on 17.10.2023.
2. In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners
seeks liberty to approach respondent/s by way of filing representation for redressal of their grievances in the light of judgment rendered by this court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra).
3. In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), Division Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Manohar Lal & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5445/2022, decided on 07.08.2023 & the Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. Vs. Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4139/2022 decided on 25.07.2023 as well as judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Director (Admn. & (Downloaded on 17/05/2024 at 09:27:16 PM) [2024:RJ-JP:20652] (3 of 4) [CW-6598/2024] HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC online SC 401 has passed the following directions:-
"It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No. 1011/2023 have also been disposed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of the orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record. Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of."
4. Ordered accordingly.
5. In the event of filing a representation by the petitioners, the respondent/s shall consider the claim of the petitioners and pass an appropriate order within two months from the date of receipt of representation with certified copy of this order and that too in accordance with law and the observations made in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), read with order dated 11.04.2023 in SLP(C) No. 3420/2023 and order dated 19.05.2023 in SLP(C) No. 1011/2023 passed by Hon'ble Apex Court, as has been referred in the case of C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. (supra).
6. The present writ petition stands disposed of.
7. The order has been passed based on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the averments made in the writ petition. The respondent/s would be at liberty to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the writ petition (Downloaded on 17/05/2024 at 09:27:16 PM) [2024:RJ-JP:20652] (4 of 4) [CW-6598/2024] in the light of the observations made by the Division Bench of this court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), and only in case the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioners be extended the relief as prayed with consequential benefits as ordered in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), read with order dated 11.04.2023 in SLP(C) No. 3420/2023 and order dated 19.05.2023 in SLP(C) No. 1011/2023 passed by Hon'ble Apex Court, as has been referred in the case of C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. (supra).
8. Since the main petition has been disposed of, the pending application/s, if any, also stands disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /19 (Downloaded on 17/05/2024 at 09:27:16 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)