Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Mehjabin vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:25925) on 25 June, 2024
Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2024:RJ-JD:25925]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1307/2024
1. Mehjabin D/o Late Shri Chand Mohammed Ji, Aged About
25 Years, B/c Mohammedan, R/o 49, Sindhi Muslim Basti,
Masuriya, Jodhpur, At Present R/o 26, Chopasani Road,
Behind Naion Ki Bagechi, Das Dukan, Jodhpur
2. Mohammed Irfan S/o Shri Mohammed Farukh, Aged
About 28 Years, B/c Mohammedan R/o 26, Chopasani
Road, Behind Naion Ki Bagechi, Das Dukan, Jodhpur
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of
Home Affairs, Jaipur,raj.
2. The Police Commsionarate, Jodhpur Metropolitan
3. The Sho, P.s. Dev Nagar, Jodhpur
4. Smt. Shahnaz W/o Shri Chand Mohammed, R/o 49,
Sindhi Muslim Basti, Masuriya, Jodhpur
5. Akbar S/o Shjri Ikramuddin Ji, R/o Village Pal, Jodhpur
6. Jakir S/o Shri Ikramuddin Ji, R/o Pal Road, Jodhpur
7. Aasif S/o Shri Akbar, R/o Village Pal, Jodhpur
8. Soaib S/o Shri Akbar, R/o Village Pal, Jodhpur
9. Saddam S/o Unknown, R/o Udaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd. Akbar
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Kumar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR(VACATION
JUDGE) Order 25/06/2024 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction for being provided with adequate security and protection. (Downloaded on 19/07/2024 at 08:39:45 PM)
[2024:RJ-JD:25925] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1307/2024] The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR(VACATION JUDGE)),J 6-divya/-
(Downloaded on 19/07/2024 at 08:39:45 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)