Rajasthan High Court
Ram Prasad Ghogaliya vs State Of Rajasthan Through The ... on 6 February, 2024
Author: Ganesh Ram Meena
Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena
[2024:RJ-JP:6179]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13315/2018
1. Ram Prasad Ghogaliya Father/o Shri Gulab Chand
Ghogaliya, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Ward No.18,
Ringus, Tehsil Shri Madhopur,
2. Ritu Chawariya W/o Shri Ram Prasad Chogaliya, Aged
About 20 Years, Resident Of Ward No.18, Ringus,
3. Ramniwas S/o Shri Gulab Chand, Aged About 20 Years,
Residient Of Ward No.18, Ringus,
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan Through The Principle Secretary, Local
Self Government Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan,
Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj)
2. The Director, Local Self Bodies, Government Of Rajasthan,
Residency Road, Jaipur (Raj)
3. Nagar Palika Ringus, District Sikar Through Its Chief
Executive Officer (Raj)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Judgment / Order 06/02/2024
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition in light of the directions given by the Division Bench of this Court vide its order dated 09.08.2019 rendered in DB Special Appeal No.1733/2018 : Virendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
2. Permission granted.
3. The present petition is permitted to be withdrawn. (Downloaded on 08/02/2024 at 08:58:33 PM)
[2024:RJ-JP:6179] (2 of 2) [CW-13315/2018]
4. The petitioners would be free to file a representation before the respondents within a period of two weeks from today.
5. In case, the representation is so addressed along with a certified copy of the order instant, the respondents shall consider petitioners' grievance in accordance with law including the judgment passed by Division Bench in the case of Virendra Kumar (supra).
6. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.
7. The writ petition so also stay application stand dismissed accordingly.
8. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioners would be entitled to the relief.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /12 (Downloaded on 08/02/2024 at 08:58:33 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)