Azharuddin Urf Azhru S/O Haneef vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:5375)

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 760 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Azharuddin Urf Azhru S/O Haneef vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:5375) on 1 February, 2024

Author: Uma Shanker Vyas

Bench: Uma Shanker Vyas

[2024:RJ-JP:5375]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
            BENCH AT JAIPUR

   S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
                             621/2024
Azharuddin Urf Azhru S/o Haneef, R/o Village Ted
P.s. Pinkawan Tehsil Punhana District Nuh Mewat
Haryana       (At      Present       Confined            In   Sub   Jail
Sambharlake District Jaipur).
                                                          ----Petitioner
                                Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                     ----Respondent

Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 853/2024 Kalu @ Kala @ Bharosi S/o Shri Arjun, R/o Gram Dhani Dand Lakhada, Tan Modi, Police Station Phagi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Presently Languishing In Sub Jail, Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur).

----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. Bhinda, Adv. & Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi, Adv., with Mr. Yenu Satyan, Adv.

For : Mr. Sher Singh Mahala, P.P. Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 01/02/2024 These bail applications have been filed by petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular (Downloaded on 02/02/2024 at 09:23:56 PM) [2024:RJ-JP:5375] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-621/2024] bail in FIR No.400/2023 registered at Police Station Fagi, District Dudu for the offence(s) under Section(s) 379/411 IPC.

Learned counsel for petitioners submit that accused-petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. They further submit that accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed these bail applications.

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge petitioners on bail.

Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners 1.Azharuddin Urf Azhru S/o Haneef & 2.Kalu @ Kala @ Bharosi S/o Shri Arjun shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that petitioners shall appear before that (Downloaded on 02/02/2024 at 09:23:56 PM) [2024:RJ-JP:5375] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-621/2024] Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

A copy of this order be placed in connected file.

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /62 & 63 (Downloaded on 02/02/2024 at 09:23:56 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)