Rajasthan High Court
Lalit Son Of Sanvarmal vs State Of Rajasthan on 1 February, 2024
Author: Birendra Kumar
Bench: Birendra Kumar
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3313/2023
Lalit Son Of Sanvarmal, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of
Kolsiya Police Station Navalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj)
(Presently Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu)
----Appellant
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
2. Mahaveer Prasad Son Of Savatram, Aged About 42 Years,
Resident Of Kolsiya, Police Station Navalgar, Dsitrict
Jhunjhunu (Raj)
3. Mahaveer Prasad Son Of Jhabarsingh, Resident Of
Kolsiya, Police Station Navalgar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj)
----Respondents
Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2851/2023 Satveer S/o Bhomaram Tetarwal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kolasiya, P.s. Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu
----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
2. Mahaveer Prasad S/o Sawat Ram Meena, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Kolsiya P.s. Nawalgarh Dist. Jhunjhunu
----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Arpan Kumar Sharma, through V.C. Ms. Prabha Sharma, through V.C. Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, through V.C. Mr. Jaswant Singh Rathore, through V.C. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, P.P., through V.C. (Downloaded on 02/02/2024 at 09:23:46 PM) (2 of 3) [CRLAS-3313/2023] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR Judgment 01/02/2024
1. Heard the parties.
2. These present criminal appeals under Section 14 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is against refusal of grant of regular bail in FIR No.215/2023 registered with Police Station Navalgarh, District Jhunjhunu for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 384 , 427, 382 and 506 IPC.
3. The appellants are in custody since 21.07.2023 and 14.08.2023 respectively. According to the FIR, co-accused Satveer along with unknown persons came in a four wheeler and committed mischief damaging the articles as well as committed assault. After investigation of the case, police found a case under Section 325 IPC and not under Section 307 IPC, made out.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal.
5. Considering the nature of allegations and nature of available material there is no need for further detention of the appellants.
6. Accordingly, orders dated 11.09.2023 and 26.10.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Jhunjhunu are set-aside and these appeals are allowed and it is directed that the above named accused- appellants be released on bail in the aforesaid FIR, if they are not wanted in any other case, provided that each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with following conditions:-
(Downloaded on 02/02/2024 at 09:23:46 PM)
(3 of 3) [CRLAS-3313/2023]
(i) the appellants shall fully co-operate in the trial, failing which,
the trial judge would be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the appellant.
(ii) the appellants shall not leave the Country without permission of the trial Court otherwise it would amount to disobedience of the order of this Court and would amount for cancellation of bail.
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J 29-30 - Ravi Khandelwal (Downloaded on 02/02/2024 at 09:23:46 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)