Sunil Jabdoliya S/O Ramphool vs The State Of Rajasthan ...

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 743 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Sunil Jabdoliya S/O Ramphool vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 1 February, 2024

Author: Uma Shanker Vyas

Bench: Uma Shanker Vyas

[2024:RJ-JP:5405]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
            BENCH AT JAIPUR

   S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
                             792/2024

Jeetram Choudhary S/o Pradhan Choudhary, Aged
About 23 Years, R/o Village Rajpurabaas, Police
Station Pachwar, District Tonk. (Accused Petitioner
Is In Central Jail, Jaipur).
                                                         ----Petitioner
                                Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                     ----Respondent

Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 833/2024 Sunil Jabdoliya S/o Ramphool, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Agarpura Sirohi, Tehsil And Police Station Niwai, Distict Tonk (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur).

----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Vijaywargia, Adv., with Mr. Balveer Sheshama, Adv.

For                      : Mr. Sher Singh Mahala, P.P.
Respondent(s)


HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 01/02/2024 These bail applications have been filed by petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular (Downloaded on 02/02/2024 at 09:24:05 PM) [2024:RJ-JP:5405] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-792/2024] bail in FIR No.18/2024 registered at Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 8/21 of NDPS Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that accused-petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. He further submits that the alleged contraband recovered in these cases is less than commercial quantity. He also submits that accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed these bail applications.

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases and the fact that recovery of alleged contraband in these cases is less than commercial quantity, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge petitioners on bail.

Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners 1.Jeetram Choudhary S/o Pradhan Choudhary & 2.Sunil Jabdoliya S/o Ramphool shall be released on bail, provided each (Downloaded on 02/02/2024 at 09:24:05 PM) [2024:RJ-JP:5405] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-792/2024] of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

A copy of this order be placed in connected file.

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /88 & 89 (Downloaded on 02/02/2024 at 09:24:05 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)