Neetu Sharma W/O Rohit Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan ...

[2023:RJ-JP:22809]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

               S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9054/2020

1.       Neetu Sharma W/o Rohit Sharma, Aged About 23 Years,
         R/o 102, Railway Colony, Bandanwara, Bhinay District
         Ajmer
2.       Sunil Sharma S/o Rajendra Prasad, R/o 102, Railway
         Colony, Bandanwara, Bhinay District Ajmer
3.       Aruna Sharma W/o Rajendra Prasad, R/o Erawat Chock,
         Chawandiya, Satwaria, District Ajmer
4.       Suresh Kumar S/o Babu Lal, R/o Bandanwara, Bhinay
         District Ajmer
5.       Fateh Singh S/o Ranjit Singh, R/o Bandanwara, Bhinay
         District Ajmer
6.       Devi Lal S/o Sultan, R/o Bandanwara, Bhinay District
         Ajmer
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Ajmer
2.       Sdo, R/o Bhinay, District Ajemr
3.       Tehsildar, Tehsil Bhinay District Ajemr
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Judgment / Order 14/09/2023

1. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

"i) By an appropriate writ, order of direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to remove the encroachment raised by the encroachers upon the land of public Road as well as Nala (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 08:02:37 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:22809] (2 of 2) [CW-9054/2020] and also take effective legal action against them and punish them suitably."

2. A Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Jagdish Prashad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., D.B.Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 10819/ 2018 vide order dated 30.01.2019 has directed creation of Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) for rural areas in every district for the redressal of grievances regarding encroachment of public land.

3. In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed off, in view of the directions issued by the Division Bench in the matter of Jagdish Prashad Meena (supra) and the petitioners are at liberty to make a representation before PLPC and the respondents are directed to decide the same within a period of four months.

4. Considering that this petition has been disposed off at the motion stage without issuing notice to the respondents, it is made clear that this Court has not commented upon the merits of the case, but only directed inquiry on the complaint as per the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prashad Meena (supra).

5. It is further directed that in the inquiry for removal of the encroachment, the persons, who are alleged to be encroachers, shall be afforded an opportunity of hearing and any proceeding against them be initiated and completed in accordance with law.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /30 (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 08:02:38 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)